resurrection of the Steppe Empire

With a semi-automated approach, a processing pipeline for geodata is presented. With the focus on segmentation for the identification of archaeological structures, 52 km² of elevation data is used. The result of this investigation should be an automatically generated city map from digital elevation data. There are several visualisation techniques for digital elevation models. Each of the techniques has its own characteristics, but also limits. In order to use these techniques correctly, the results have to compared, to know which landscape suits which technique. To make the images more understandable, visualisation from remote sensing and methods from computer science were used together to enhance the visibility of certain landscape properties.

Left: With low computational power hillshading produces understandable results. Small elevations are also visible. One issue is that only one side of the structure is dominant. Right: SVF presents mostly big building and elevations. Small archaeological features are hardly visible.

Combining the Canny edge detection and morphological operations is a good way to analyse specific areas. The first row of images shows different thresholds of the canny algorithm. The second and third rows present the usage of dilation and erosion. Through the combination of dilation and erosion it is possible to close or open structures, especially useful for noisy data.
Comparing the canny and the holistically edge detection the results are quite distinguish. The canny algorithm shows a lot of small lines. HED produces fewer structures which are thicker. From distance the results of HED are clearer but on the other hand small features get lost.

An attempt was made to improve existing visualizations and to create meaningful images that preserve the positive properties of individual technologies. The combination of several technologies makes it possible to see different topographical features in one image. Nevertheless, there is a danger of wrong use. Important landscape features might be missed or even removed. It is therefore of great importance that the information about the raw data, scan density, methods of generating the DEMs and the visualization methods used are well documented. Thus, the assessment of artefacts can be performed better later.

More information and results will be published on the CHNT.

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert